Episode
Anpanman - Golden Dome Unlocked
In an impromptu, solo X Spaces session recorded the evening the news broke (published 2026-01-16), Anpanman walks through AST SpaceMobile's selection as an IDIQ recipient on the Missile Defense Agency's 'SHIELD' program.
SHIELD is the primary contracting vehicle for the Golden Dome missile-defense initiative with a $151 billion shared program ceiling over 10 years. He frames the selection as long-awaited validation of the 'dual-use' defense thesis that community researcher CatSE (Katzy) championed since 2021-2022.
He also walks through the mechanics of the award and a second pending opportunity (MDA 'Noble'), reacts to the stock's jump toward $107, and pushes back on skeptical analysts and short sellers.
His headline conclusion: 2026 is shaping up to be the year defense revenue becomes the dominant, and increasingly unignorable, part of AST SpaceMobile's story.
Key Takeaways
- AST SpaceMobile was named an IDIQ (Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity) recipient on the Missile Defense Agency's SHIELD program (Scalable Homeland Innovative Enterprise Layer Defense), the primary contracting vehicle for the Golden Dome missile-defense initiative, with a program ceiling of $151 billion shared across multiple awardees over 10 years.
- The IDIQ award itself is not a guarantee of specific revenue — it prequalifies AST as a 'program of record' so the company can now compete for and win individual Golden Dome task orders; Anpanman spitballs this first tranche could be worth roughly $1 to $2.5 billion to AST, though he stresses this is an estimate.
- A second, potentially larger Golden Dome-related opportunity called MDA 'Noble' (an umbrella vehicle for rapidly funding non-traditional defense contractors on space-based sensors and electronic warfare) is still pending; Anpanman characterizes today's award as 'big' and Noble as potentially 'massive.'
- ASTS stock moved from about $101.30 (where Anpanman bought 2,000 shares) up through $103.30 (where he bought 2,000 more) to a reported $107.36 the following session on the news.
- AST President Scott Wisniewski has guided that a majority of 2026 revenue will come from defense contracts, with meaningful commercial MNO revenue not expected until 2027; Anpanman characterizes this as implying 'hundreds of millions' of revenue in 2026, though he frames the specific figure as his own read on Scott's comments.
- FM1 and FM2 (HALO-program prototype satellites for the Space Development Agency) are sitting at Cape Canaveral awaiting launch on Blue Origin's New Glenn 3; Anpanman believes the launch has slipped from a January target to likely February, possibly March, due to government-requirement changes and New Glenn booster-refurbishment delays.
- Community researcher CatSE (Katzy) is credited as having first argued AST's large phased-array satellites could serve non-communications defense applications (radar sensing, GPS backup, electronic warfare) as far back as 2021-2022, sustaining that thesis through the stock's early-2024 lows near $2.
- Wall Street analysts B. Riley and Scotiabank downgraded ASTS in the days just before the Golden Dome award, and their price targets ($105 for B. Riley, $45.60 for Scotiabank) are now well below the trading price, which Anpanman expects will force upward ratings/target revisions.
- Anpanman rebuts a bearish Seeking Alpha piece (Pythia Research) that flagged American Tower's sale of 2.28 million ASTS shares as a risk signal, arguing it reflects broader tower-sector stress from satellite-based supplemental coverage (citing American Tower's $1.9 billion cash versus $45 billion debt) rather than a negative read on AST specifically.
- Short interest in ASTS was roughly 40.8 million shares on January 9, falling to about 38.5 million shares by January 12 and holding flat through January 14, per Anpanman's data (he states the January 9 figure with an ambiguous 'billion' unit that appears to be a slip for millions given the later figures).
Detailed Discussion11 topics
The MDA SHIELD Golden Dome Award
5
-
AST SpaceMobile was named a recipient of the 3rd tranche of the Missile Defense Agency's SHIELD program (Scalable Homeland Innovative Enterprise Layer Defense), the primary contracting vehicle for the Golden Dome initiative to develop a multi-domain system to detect, track and intercept advanced threats like hypersonics, ballistics and cruise missiles; the total program ceiling is $151 billion shared across multiple awards over 10 years.
-
The award is an IDIQ (indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity) contract vehicle — it doesn't hand AST guaranteed revenue directly but 'prequalifies' the company to then go pursue billions of dollars of specific Golden Dome task-order work, moving AST from a one-off experiment to a program of record.
-
Spitballing potential dollar value, Anpanman estimates this first tranche could be worth roughly $1 billion to $2.5 billion to AST, explicitly caveating 'we'll see.'
-
He notes the timing lines up with what the community had been expecting — Space Mob had pushed its prediction to 'mid-January,' and the award materialized on January 15.
-
Anpanman is hopeful AST issues a formal PR/8-K on the award (as it did previously for the SDA and DIU awards) and says if he were company counsel he'd consider the news material enough to require an 8-K filing at minimum.
Dual-Use Thesis and Community Due Diligence
4
-
Community researcher CatSE ('Katzy') is credited as the first, going back to 2021-2022, to argue that AST's large phased-array satellites could be used for radar sensing, GPS backup, electronic warfare and other non-communications military applications beyond connectivity — roughly 10 different defense use cases are now understood to be applicable.
-
CatSE kept publishing this dual-use due diligence even during the stock's trough near $2 in early 2024, despite skepticism at times from within the community, including from Anpanman and Kook themselves.
-
Anpanman references having circulated Golden Dome-themed graphics referencing Cerberus (a defense-focused investor with a stake in Ligado) standing over a golden dome above the US, tied to the fact that Cerberus co-founder Steve Feinberg serves as the Department of War's number two — used as part of the community's argument that Ligado spectrum would be integral to Golden Dome.
-
Scott Wisniewski has stated that the defense business will be bigger than the commercial business in the company's early years.
MDA 'Noble' — the Second Golden Dome Opportunity
4
-
AST is separately being evaluated for MDA 'Noble,' described as a specialized umbrella vehicle ('nimble options for buying layered effects') designed to bypass traditional slow military procurement, letting MDA rapidly fund non-traditional contractors like commercial space companies through submitted white papers rather than a single rigid contract.
-
The Noble solicitation calls specifically for space-based sensors and integrated non-kinetic/electronic warfare capabilities — detecting RF launches, tracking hypersonic signatures, jamming and intelligence-gathering — which Anpanman argues fits AST's phased-array satellites well with only limited software/hardware changes.
-
Anpanman characterizes today's SHIELD award as 'big' in the company's own sizing language, while the still-pending Noble opportunity could be 'massive'; he is uncertain on timing, guessing it could come in 'a few days, weeks.'
-
He argues this Noble-type work would shift AST's positioning from a communications provider (data to warfighters, drone/vehicle coordination) toward being part of the actual 'kill chain' — detecting and stopping missile threats — which could command higher margins and stickier contracts than standard connectivity.
Existing Defense Contracts and FM1/FM2 Launch Timeline
4
-
Heading into this award, AST already had 9 military contracts, including the SDA's roughly $43 million award; the SDA is itself part of the Golden Dome/SHIELD ecosystem.
-
FM1 and FM2, currently at Cape Canaveral awaiting launch on Blue Origin's New Glenn 3, are HALO-program satellites — SDA funding developed these as prototypes to prove out AST's technology, and Anpanman believes HALO also pays for the launches (both the ISRO LVM3 and this New Glenn launch).
-
AST also received about $10 million from the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), described as effectively 'Skunk Works' for the Department of War, tasked with evaluating next-generation technologies for adoption across military branches.
-
Anpanman believes (without full certainty) the FM1/FM2 New Glenn 3 launch has slipped from a January target to more likely February, and possibly into March, due to government-requirement changes that delayed satellite completion plus New Glenn booster-refurbishment delays tied to reusing a previously flown booster for the first time.
2026 Revenue Guidance and Production Capacity
5
-
At a recent Bank of America conference, Scott Wisniewski reiterated guidance of $50 to $75 million of second-half revenue; Anpanman thinks there's a reasonable chance it lands at the lower end given the FM1/FM2 launch delays.
-
Scott has said 2026 will be the year of commercialization and wants investors to shift from counting launch cadence to counting revenue; the majority of 2026 revenue is expected to come from defense contracts, with commercial MNO revenue becoming meaningful in 2027.
-
Anpanman's own characterization of Scott's comments is that 2026 revenue could reach 'hundreds of millions,' implying the 9 existing defense contracts are expected to grow materially and that new Golden Dome-related orders are anticipated.
-
At the same conference, Scott discussed potentially ramping satellite production from 6 per month to 10-12 per month, plus a dedicated new Midland site solely for building Micron modules, and referenced a 'government shell' — Anpanman reads this as signaling AST expects large military orders requiring a separate, third constellation dedicated to defense applications (distinct from the low-band and Ligado mid-band commercial constellations).
-
Manufacturing footprint has grown from what the community once considered a large 400,000 square feet to 500,000 square feet currently, with Anpanman speculating it could flex up further to 600,000-700,000 square feet.
Market Reaction and Trading Activity
3
-
The news broke after hours; the stock moved from about $101.30, where Anpanman bought 2,000 shares, up to about $103.30, where he bought another 2,000 shares, and was trading at $107.36 on decent volume as of the recording.
-
Anpanman contrasts this reaction with awards to peers like Rocket Lab, Voyager and Firefly, which he says are typically already 'priced in' and expected; he argues the market was more surprised by AST's award because most investors don't fully appreciate the non-communications applications of AST's large phased arrays.
-
He predicted to Kook (before the news) that the market reaction to a Golden Dome-related announcement would be very positive, and says that's what played out.
Analyst Ratings and Price Targets
4
-
B. Riley and Scotiabank both downgraded AST shortly before the award (about 1 and 3 days prior, respectively); B. Riley's downgrade nonetheless raised its price target to $105, now the highest street target and below the current trading price.
-
Current street price targets cited: Scotiabank $45.60 (sell), UBS $43 (neutral, stale from early December), Clear Street $87 (mid-November), Deutsche Bank $81, Roth Capital $82.50, Cantor $80, and Barclays $60 (downgraded to underweight in mid-October).
-
Anpanman expects most of these analysts will have to raise price targets given the news, though he expects Scotiabank specifically to resist changing its view, noting Scotia's notes since June have not meaningfully addressed the defense angle.
-
He suspects much of the street is waiting for further satellite launches and unfolding events before getting more aggressive with rating/target upgrades, which he calls a fair posture.
Short Seller Pushback
5
-
A short seller referred to as 'Raging Capital,' who Anpanman says made his money on message boards before moving into asset management/venture, argued a week or two prior that AST is 'basically another Iridium'; Anpanman rebuts this, arguing the world and technology have changed since the 1990s and that AST provides connectivity to unmodified phones rather than requiring a dedicated $1,000 satellite handset.
-
A short seller write-up (unnamed) argued AST would only ever be a minor sub-prime contractor with low margins on any defense work; Anpanman disputes this, saying AST is actually a prime contractor for the SDA and receives direct work with meaningfully sized contracts.
-
Seeking Alpha contributor Pythia Research published a piece titled 'AST SpaceMobile Reality Check,' which Anpanman dismisses as a low-quality outlet; one claim he specifically rebuts is that American Tower sold 2.28 million shares pre-launch as a valuation-driven risk-management signal, despite retaining a 0.84% economic stake.
-
He also references a short seller nicknamed 'Valuations,' who he says built a meme/cult-framing short thesis rather than substantive new arguments, and notes newer short sellers tend to omit or downplay the military side of the business because they don't understand it.
-
Short interest was about 40.8 million shares on January 9, falling to about 38.5 million shares by January 12, and held roughly flat through January 12-14; he attributes some of the move to short covering and some to convertible-bond arbitrage traders delta-hedging.
American Tower Stake Sale and Tower Sector Read-Through
3
-
Anpanman contextualizes American Tower's share sale as part of a broader tower-sector decline: after EchoStar pulled back its own network buildout, the market lost a 4th major tower spender, pressuring American Tower, Crown Castle and SBA share prices, compounded by growing fears that Supplemental Coverage from Space will erode tower demand.
-
He cites American Tower's balance sheet as having $1.9 billion of cash against $45 billion of debt, framing the sale of Class A shares (while retaining Class B shares) as sensible financial planning that also captured a strong return, rather than a bearish signal on AST.
-
He draws a parallel to Iridium, which he says the market similarly dismissed on the supplemental-coverage-from-space threat before 'suddenly' waking up, with Iridium's stock falling from around $40 to about $19.
Valuation Debate
4
-
Responding to a listener referencing a Substack calling Golden Dome 'hopium,' Anpanman rejects the framing and compares persistent short-seller skepticism to years of similar valuation-based shorting against Tesla, arguing hedge funds' short time horizons cause them to miss longer-term inflection points.
-
He recalls Scotiabank's bear-case model using an out-year free cash flow build of roughly $3.5 billion, growing to $6 billion, then $10 billion, then about $17.5 billion (around 2032), noting that reaching $17.5 billion in annual free cash flow would place AST among the top 10 public companies by free cash flow — using Scotia's own bearish model to argue the long-term case is actually very large.
-
He argues the short case has historically focused only on commercial adoption/willingness-to-pay and largely ignored the defense side, where no one has really built a quantified valuation argument; he guesses defense could be worth 'a few billion' in annual revenue depending on use cases, covering radar sensing and electronic warfare in addition to communications.
-
On sum-of-the-parts valuation of AST's roughly $40 billion market cap, he pushes back on the idea that a $12-15 billion valuation for the Ligado spectrum alone is excessive, leaving $25-30 billion for the combined commercial and military business, arguing this isn't unreasonable and drawing a parallel to EchoStar, whose spectrum was undervalued by the market until AT&T and Starlink/SpaceX-related deals repriced it.
Broader Context: Golden Dome Urgency, Geopolitics, and Sector Sentiment
5
-
He notes the Trump administration has stated a goal of having Golden Dome operational before the President leaves office, adding time pressure to the buildout and reinforcing the case for well-resourcing capable providers like AST.
-
He frames the broader competitive dynamic as the US and its space companies (including AST and Starlink) versus China's efforts to replicate US space capabilities, rather than AST and Starlink being true adversaries, noting the commercial market is large enough for both.
-
He references FCC Chair Carr's comments identifying direct-to-cell as a key area of US leadership focus, and cites Starlink's use in Iran amid Russian-technology jamming as an example of satellite connectivity's dual-use, defense-relevant value (e.g., backup GPS, electronic warfare/jamming resilience).
-
He mentions roughly 4 to 5 new space-focused ETFs are about to launch, drawing an analogy to the early days of crypto investing when the space was overlooked before becoming mainstream, and notes space stocks were among the top performers of 2025 and have continued into 2026.
-
He draws analogies to Amazon (dismissed early for needing to 'sell every book on earth' before expanding into AWS) and Nvidia (graphics processors expanding into other applications) to argue AST is similarly expanding beyond its original commercial-broadband use case into detection/radar applications.
Watch Items4
-
Formal company PR and/or 8-K filing confirming the MDA SHIELD/Golden Dome award
-
Second Golden Dome-related award via the MDA 'Noble' program
-
FM1 and FM2 satellite launch on Blue Origin's New Glenn 3
-
Analyst rating/price-target revisions from Scotiabank, B. Riley, UBS, Barclays, Deutsche Bank, Roth Capital, Cantor and Clear Street in response to the Golden Dome news
Open Questions5
-
Will AST SpaceMobile issue an official PR or 8-K filing confirming the SHIELD/Golden Dome award, and when?
-
When will the MDA 'Noble' program opportunity be decided, and how large could that second award be relative to today's SHIELD award?
-
Will FM1/FM2 actually launch in February, or slip further into March, given New Glenn booster-refurbishment and prior government-requirement delays?
-
How should investors quantify the value of AST's defense business, given that no one has built a rigorous valuation framework for the non-communications (radar, electronic warfare, PNT) use cases?
-
Will 2026 second-half revenue land at the low end of the previously guided $50-75 million range given launch delays, or will new defense task orders push results higher?
Raw Transcript
Show full transcript
[00:00:06] Speaker A: This is the AST SpaceMobile Podcast. [00:00:09] Speaker B: It will just basically come to your phone and be seamless regardless of where you are. We don't want the user even to know that it's connected by satellite. Listen, the opportunity that we have is very, very, very large. [00:00:27] Speaker C: Good evening, everyone. Thanks for joining this last-minute space that I'm holding in lieu of, or because of the news that came out today after hours, which we'll see if the company PRs it tomorrow, which would be quite interesting just given that I think a lot of people have left for the long weekend, meaning institutions, but clearly Retail is probably still sticking around. And as we head into options expiry, which I remember earlier this week I had said that I thought we were going to consolidate around 100 and likely then, you know, move higher after this week unless something groundbreaking came out, which clearly that's just happened. So I think this morning I said it feels like something's going to happen, and indeed something did. Not that I knew, but it certainly felt like it. So, you know, as they say, markets can be efficient, and perhaps some folks out there knew, which was why AST was strong over the course of the day. But anyway, yeah, thanks everyone for joining. I wanted to hold this space because we've hit a pretty significant milestone. I think this milestone in particular is really huge for the company because it's, in terms of the financial impact, it's going to be pretty massive. And then it's a huge validation for what the company's doing. And what I mean by that is, you know, going back to, and I've talked to a few people about this and I remember I, you know, I just actually earlier today just sent Katzi a message thanking him for all his work. Going back to 2021, 2022, it was Katzy who was first to really talk about the dual use case of AST space mobile satellites. Because by having this large phased array orbiting the Earth, besides doing connectivity, there were a number of other things you could do around radar sensing, GPS backup. And now we've learned that there's probably about 10 different use cases besides communications that would be applicable to military applications. And so, but yeah, hats off to Cathie for doing all this work. As I've explained in my Spaces and also Cook has explained, there were some pretty dark times over the past several years where even in the throes of trading down to $2 in the early part of 2024, Cathie continued to put out due diligence, just hammering home the case that beyond just providing communications to warfighters, there were these other aspects of what the company could do around electronic warfare, radar, very particular radar type of sensing applications, what have you. And so I think we all owe a huge debt of gratitude to Katzy for all his work. And even in the face of skepticism, whether that was outside the community or in the community. Because there were points in time where even myself or Cook, um, would question, you know, hey, Katzi, this is great, but I'm not sure, um, you know, this— what you're proposing makes sense, but I'm not sure it's going to be relevant, or maybe the company's not doing it. But lo and behold, like, he, he was right the entire time. So, um, Yeah, I think this award that came out this evening is a big deal because I think at Space Mob, a lot of investors already know about the potential dual use case of the company's satellites, whether it's the existing commercial satellites that are going to be put up or potentially satellites that will be purpose-built for the government. But it's important in that Taking a step back, most investors don't really know what AST SpaceMobile is. Like, it's not on most people's radars. I mean, people understand Starlink. They probably, there's probably a pretty decent, and if you look at like institutional ownership, it's certainly true. Like there's probably most people on the street know Rocket Lab and what they do, right? And out of the gate, Rocket Lab has always had a pretty significant institutional support after they went public. But AST was kind of like this niche company and, you know, hey, it's for the people that spent any, you know, that took the time and did some research, you know, oh wow, this company's like doing broadband connectivity to unmodified phones. That seems like, or that could be a big market. But then I think, you know, in the confusion of things, I think people probably either they didn't know about AST SpaceMobile or they do, they did, but then they assumed it was like something similar to what Iridium does, right? Or, or, you know, we, we saw a few short sellers come out over the last few weeks. What was this guy like, Raging Capital? This guy was, this guy had made his money on building, I think, some social, actually it was like some message boards back in the day, which became popular. And then, you know, he moved into like managing assets and then moved over to the venture side. But I think he tweeted like a week ago or 2 weeks ago about how he was shorting AST because it's basically another Iridium and, you know, the story's the same, which we kind of poked fun at him. Like, yeah, Iridium is a completely different company. I won't go into all the details, but I mean, the key aspect which the guy missed is like, The world is very different than 1990s. Like a lot of technology has changed and what the company's doing has changed and it's providing connectivity to unmodified devices, right? Like there's no friction in turning on the service versus selling someone a $1,000 brick phone that can do texting and limited voice, right? Those are very different value propositions. But anyway, but that's kind of like the general, and I'm sure like many of you have pitched AST SpaceMobile to friends and family and you probably get met with some level of skepticism. And then, you know, like we all say, after that 5 minutes you get pushback, but then after an hour they're like, okay, yeah, I'm going to invest. But that's the general perception by the market, right? Like I think the company is misunderstood. Only a few people truly understand it. And then only a small subset of those people truly understand That there's not just a commercial business here. There's also the defense business, right? There's defense and there's like the first responder business as well. And the defense business, as Scott in his own words, you know, that is a business that is going to be bigger than the commercial business in the early years, right? And so I think for those that do know the news out today, you know, it's, I was joking with Cook about how 'Cause he asked me, he's like, well, what do you think the market reaction will be? And I, and, you know, is it going to be positive? Like, are people going to be confused? And I told him like, yeah, it's going to be very positive, right? Like, I think we've seen this where some of these other companies like Rocket Lab, Voyager, Firefly, they get awards and it's expected, right? And we joke about like, things are priced in to an extent. Like it was priced in for those companies because it was kind of expected. Whereas I think for AST SpaceMobile, people see this consumer broadband connectivity company. They don't truly understand the implications of having a large, massive phased array in lower Earth orbit, like the different applications you can do with that. And so I think people were dismissive of all the things that we've been posting for over a year now, right? I remember putting together, sending out these, the tweets with the Golden Dome, like having Cerberus. The reason why we put Cerberus on there is because Cerberus is a big defense investor. They own a piece of Legato, and we believe that Legato Spectrum is going to be an integral part of Golden Dome. And Cerberus, Steve Feinberg, who is the Sorry, that's my— those are my kids yelling. Um, but anyway, Steve Feinberg, uh, is his number 2 at the Department of War. And so, um, having that connection, that's why we, we tweet those things with Cerberus standing over like this golden dome over the US, um, for those that don't know. But yeah, we've been, um, pushing this, this narrative that they are going to win Golden Dome based off of our due diligence. And lo and behold, um, that happened. today, right? And so this is a huge point of validation. I think even valuations, this like short seller douchebag guy who wrote, who did a write-up, like part of his write-up was he was very skeptical that the company would get anything. He also doesn't, you know, I guess he didn't do his work. Like he was saying, well, the company's just going to be a minor prime, minor subprime to a prime if they get work and it'll be low margin. What he doesn't know is that the company is actually a prime for SDA, and the company is getting direct work, and the numbers are going to be pretty big, right? And so I think that's where, for us as Space Mob investors, understanding, you know, we talk about this whole idea of know what you own is important, right? Because this company is not just about commercial, it's about defense. Which is going to be pretty large. It's also about first responder networks. It's going to, you know, SatCo JV, there's significant upside there in terms of providing a sovereign turnkey solution for Europe, which also leads to potential awards for 2 GHz MSS spectrum in 2027. I mean, there's just so many different threads to this story that I could go on and on and talk about it, but But yeah, I think, I think the, as we saw overnight, or as we're seeing now, I think the stock's trading at $107.36 on pretty decent volume. When I saw the news and the stock was like at $101.30, I happened to have some money that I freed up today. And so I bought 2,000 shares at $101.30. And then, and then I didn't, you know, the stock started to move a little bit. And so I bought another 2,000 at like $103.30, I think it was. And then I think as people kind of started to understand the implications of this, the stock started to move further. And so I think tomorrow, I mean, who knows, right? Like, I think it is pretty tough to predict where AST trades on any given day, just given the algo, I guess we'd call it like, pardon my French, but the algo fuckery that happens and any number of different things that are going on. with this particular stock or different factors. But yeah, I think tomorrow we should open up pretty strong and as people digest this and, you know, we happen to be blessed, by the way, with like B. Riley and Scotiabank who downgraded our ratings a day ago and 3 days ago. That's good, by the way, because like the stock hung in there just fine on the downgrades and quite candidly, like I was able to add some upside exposure. But when you have one of the things on the street that's tough is like if you have a stock that's doing well and everybody's bullish on it, like everyone has a buy rating, there's no place to move. Like they can move targets up, but then that doesn't really give you the financial juice, right? But when analysts are forced to upgrade stocks by ratings, and either they do that on a single rating or they do what we call a double upgrade, Right? So, so for example, Scotia is primed to do a double upgrade at some point, right? They're on a sell rating. So eventually, um, and you know, they have the, the notoriety, they and, um, B. Riley, of downgrading the stock, uh, on the eve of our first Golden Dome Award. So, um, another, another, um, I guess badge of honor for Scotia, who's been Pretty awful. I mean, after getting turned by hedge funds to be bearish on the name, they've been pretty bad on their timing. Or I guess you could look at it as pretty good, right? Because they've become like a few other characters, like they've become like inverse indicators, right? But the good thing about that is you now have this award, and we are expecting another one. And for those Those people who've continued to doubt like Space Mob due diligence, yeah, you're, don't, don't do that because we actually are pretty good at what we do. But yeah, there's, there's basically like 2 awards, right? And so this first one is the first piece. Now I'll talk a little bit about the 2 awards and, and I will, I will say like I had to have, you know, Gemini helped me out in kind of deciphering some of this stuff. But today's award was for the 3rd tranche of the Missile Defense Agency SHiELD program. And so this one in particular, they call it Scalable Homeland Innovative Enterprise Layer Defense, which the acronym is SHiELD. The total program ceiling for this is $151 billion, and that's shared over multiple awards for 10 years. And so what this does is You know, this is a contracting vehicle, the primary contracting vehicle for the Golden Dome initiative. And, you know, this in particular is to, you know, develop a multi-domain system to detect, track, intercept advanced threats like hypersonics, ballistics, and other cruise missiles. And so what this means for AST is that, you know, AST was named as a recipient, which is an IDIQ, which is indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity. And what that means is that this gives the company now the license, you know, it's like the entree to then go pursue billions of dollars for contract work, right? And so you have to kind of pass this first stage in order to start doing work for Golden Dome, right? So it prequalifies them. And so now the company has the ability to go in and win work. And I think what's important about this is that this is a— this is a validation of the dual use of the technology, right? And so the Department of Defense, what it says is, and I guess taking a step back, heading into this, we have 9 military contracts of which the SDA gave us like $43 million. And the SDA is part of this, by the way. And so, FM-1 and FM-2, which is sitting down in Cape Canaveral right now waiting to launch on Blue Origin New Glenn 3. Those 2 satellites are HALO satellites. So HALO, in that project from the SDA, they allocated money to various contractors to develop 2 prototypes to prove out their technology, right? And I believe HALO actually pays Pays for the launches as well. So, and maybe you know this was one of our questions for Scott, but I believe LVM three and you know Isra LVM three, but then also this New Glenn launch will be paid for by the government. And so, but yeah, so AST is part of that program. They also, you know, some of you guys may have read this past week about the DIU. The Defense Innovation Unit. And that is like, it's basically like Skunk Works, right? For the Department of War. And so when I, and then that program, AST got $10 million from that department. And the purpose of DIU is to evaluate new next generation technologies and then figure out ways that that technology can be used in the various departments of the government. defense, the different armed forces, whether that's like the Navy, the Air Force, Army, et cetera. So today is the 10th, now we've been assigned or we have the ability to go hunt for Golden Dome work, which the company feels very confident in their position in that. And I guess one thing I would, in terms of characterizing that, The company had mentioned, I think it was at Bank of America, the Bank of America conference where they reiterated the guidance of $50 to $75 million of second half revenue. We'll see where that comes out. I think there's probably a reasonable chance that it'll come out the lower end of that. And the reason why is that we've, we are, in terms of our launch, have been delayed. And that's been, I've talked about this before, but FM1 and FM2, From what we believe, I can't say this definitively, but I think there were some changes in terms of government requirements. And so the satellites needed additional time and then they got out the door a bit late. And then of course, there were some launch provider delays as well. And in particular for New Glenn 3, refurbishing those boosters, which they're planning to reuse, and this is part of the program to see if they can turn them around pretty quickly. I mean, this is the first time they're doing it, you know, using the same booster. That's going to take a bit more time than they'd expected. And so instead of a January launch, you're probably looking more like something in February and perhaps even possibly moving into March. But the cool thing, as I mentioned this morning, is that, you know, sending FM2 on New Glenn 3 is going to be pretty badass. And having the opportunity to go down there and see the new spacecraft, which is FM-2, going up on the new rocket, New Glenn 3, that's going to be pretty special. So yeah, so I think— where was I going with that? Oh, so going back to Bank of America, Scott had mentioned how— This coming year, 2026, will be the year of commercialization, of course, but that he wants to move from people counting launch cadence to counting revenue, right? And part of the characterization of that was the fact that this coming year in 2026, a majority of the revenues that are expected are going to be defense revenues, right? And so This year, a majority of financial performance will be coming from defense contracts. And my guess is, you know, you mix a bit of FirstNet in there as well. And then he was saying you'll have commercial revenues from their MNOs start to kick in in a meaningful way, in a more meaningful way in 2027. And so what does that mean if you're looking at And I think the characterization is like hundreds of millions of revenue this year. So if that's the case, like in addition to those 9 contracts that go from items of record to something much bigger, that would indicate that the company has expectations that they are planning to get something from Golden Dome. And so in particular, in that conference, Scott had mentioned the idea of potentially ramping up, expanding facilities to ramp up production from 6 satellites to potentially 10 to 12 satellites. And just given how quickly they want to deploy the commercial constellation, that would suggest by building those additional satellites, and he also mentioned a government shell at the end of that talk, It would seem that they are expecting some pretty material military contracts to come in this year, or not contracts to come in, but those initial orders to expand quite materially. And as you mentioned in that presentation as well, that they are looking for another site in Midland to solely dedicate production space to only building Microns. And so clearly the company moving from 400,000 square feet, which was, you know, we thought was pretty big, to 500,000 square feet, which is where they are now, and then probably flexing that up to 600,000, 650,000, 700,000. I mean, who knows where it kind of ends up, but that means that they're expecting some really big work ahead and it's not going to be just the first low-band constellation or the second mid-band constellation, which will utilize the Gato spectrum, but We're probably talking about a constellation that's focused on defense applications, so a third shell. So, so that's, that's pretty damn exciting. And so going back to the what today's, you know, award or, you know, the, the IDIQ for AST SpaceMobile, this opens up a lot of DOD work around Golden Dome for them. In particular, I guess the potential for the company, and I think, I mean, I don't know, we've tried to, we've tried to like put some numbers around it, but I feel like the company, you know, you could be looking at billions of dollars, like $1 to $2.5 billion this first tranche. I mean, we'll see, but this is a mechanism where You know, the company goes to a program of record versus a one-off experiment. And so I think the key thing, as I mentioned before, is that now we've moved from BaseMOM speculating that the company is part of Golden Dome to actually it happening, right? And it being a reality. And so the timing, like we had talked about, I think we had pushed it back to like mid-January and And lo behold, it's January 15th. And so this initial part is just, I think, one of 2 programs that the company has talked about with investors. And I believe, I could be wrong here, but I believe this is the smaller part of it in terms of potential dollars or early potential dollars. And so today they got the IDIQ for this particular piece. There's another piece which I think is relevant for the company as well, which is Let me just go through some notes here. So the company is being evaluated for the MDA Noble. It's nimble options for buying layered effects. And this is listed— well, I won't go through the solicitation number, but this particular— let's see here. This particular area is specialized. It's a specialized umbrella vehicle design specifically to bypass traditional slow military procurement. It also allows for MDA to rapidly award contracts to non-traditional sources like commercial space companies for disruptive technologies. And so I guess the mechanism of this is that instead of a single rigid contract, it operates as a continuous open door where companies can submit white papers that they propose against specific needs, and then If MDA likes the idea, then they can quickly fund it. And so why is that relevant to AST SpaceMobile? Well, in particular, let's see here. So the non-traditional designation, this solicitation explicitly targets companies that don't typically do defense work as a primary business, which that's AST SpaceMobile, which as we all know, you know, is commercial first, cellular broadband provider. So it fits the non-traditional definition. And then there are some specific, I guess, requests in that, in this area where AST fits quite well, which is the call for space-based sensors. And under the specific call, let's see here, MDA is asking for space-based sensors and integrated non-kinetic and electronic warfare. And so that fits what ASD is doing quite well. Let's see here. So what this suggests is that MDA is not just looking for bluebirds on the commercial side or for communications, but as Scott mentioned, for non-communication applications such as using, you know, the large phased arrays as sensors to detect RF launches or tracking hypersonic signatures. And then there's, of course, Electronic warfare, so jamming signals, you know, gathering intelligence and all that stuff. And so in this particular program, what the government's looking for is rapid capability development. So that kind of mirrors what AST is doing, given that we are launching a constellation. And that constellation can actually do, in addition to its primary work, which is, you know, communications, it can do these other things as well with very limited Very limited changes, maybe at software and some changes to hardware. And so the strategic implication is that this moves AST not from what we would typically view as communications applications, like sending data to warfighters, like drones, coordinating between vehicles, things like that, which you typically would think of as a as a communications provider company, it moves from that to kill chain. So what I mean by that is a network that's used to detect and stop missile threats, but also within that framework for defense work, that means that the company could command much higher margins and stickier contracts than just standard connectivity. And so That one, let me just take a look here. I don't think that— so that one is going to be awarded later. And I believe that one, that one is what the company refers to as, you know, in terms of sizing, there's this big thing, and then there's something that's massive. And so I think what we got today is big. And then this particular area could be massive, right? And so, so yeah, I think, I think when taking a step back, we've come pretty far away, right? We are now, we are now, I guess, in terms of the most visible program, Golden Dome, we're now you know, developing, doing development work for Golden Dome. We'll provide technology, um, everything that Scott has hinted at and people have, you know, speculated. And of course skeptics have said that's not going to happen, you know, whether that's our friend Dim Spacebar, Tim Ferrar, or Valuation, some of these new shorts who all say the defense work is a pipe dream and it's something that SpaceBob has made up. Um, that's not the case. We actually are in line to get Golden Dome work. And I don't think it's just going to be, I mean, to a degree it's going to piggyback off the current constellation, but I also believe that it is going to expand into potentially a dedicated constellation, which is why the company is getting additional production capacity in space. So let me pause there. I'm going to see if there's any questions or comments. There's some pretty funny comments here. But yeah, I actually, I don't see any questions. I do think, you know, it'll be interesting to see what the research analyst community response is. Like I said before, you know, you had B. Riley downgrade the rating, although they did raise the price target to $105, which is now the highest and happens to be under our current trading price. And that is a risk, I will say. If you look at the Street, like Scotia, of course, is at $45.60. You have UBS, which is pretty stale, stale meaning the beginning of December. They're at neutral at $43. You've got Clear Street, which is a mid-November price target of 87, Deutsche Bank 81, Roth Capital 82.50, Cantor 80, Barclays, oh yeah, they downgraded to underweight, which is basically sell in mid-October. That was 60. So these analysts, they're going to have to make some adjustments probably with this news because some of them, I don't expect Scotiabank to do anything because they seem pretty dug in. But what's funny is, like, in their downgrade and their notes since June, they have not talked about the defense angle. I don't believe, or I can't remember, I don't think they've really talked about it, or if they did, they downplayed it. So they're going to have to go through some gymnastics to explain this away. But some of these other research analysts, just, you know, I think it's important to know that their price targets are much lower. And either, you know, they'll probably have to raise the price targets, but you might have more of these rating changes to the neutral side from buy to justify that, you know, a price target that's not much higher than where we are. I mean, I don't know, maybe some of these guys will be more bullish, but I think probably a decent amount of the street is waiting for several launches and of course for BB6 to unfold before they get aggressive on changing their ratings upwards and price targets upwards, which is, you know, that's fair. But I do think, as I mentioned before, I think the reaction to this news this evening, which is pretty material, and hopefully Scott's listening and he'll put out PR because I think, and they have done this in the past, like when they got the SDA award and the DIE award, they They did put a PR out and I think, I don't know if I was outside counsel or if I was general counsel, I would be recommending to the company that this is pretty material and that you'd have to at a minimum 8-K it, but, you know, put out PR. So hopefully that comes tomorrow. And as I mentioned before, just to give people an update, I think, let's see, short interest real time. has actually come down a little bit. So maybe some guys got smart and covered what was going to be a complete disaster for them. So on January 9th, like the short interest was $40.8 billion, and then January 12th it went down to $38.5 billion. So there was some covering, and obviously like there's some noise too from convert arbs who are trading deltas. And so when the stock goes up, they'll short some, and when the stock goes down, they'll buy some. That's how you monetize the underlying call option in a convert. So there's a bit of that, but over, let's see, January 12th, January 13th, January 14th, it's been pretty flat. Like it's been 38.5 million shares short, right? So that said, yeah, I mean, I think it was Kook that reached out to me after this news came out and asked me point blank, you know, if you're short, like, what's the thesis now? And of course, like, you can, I think for a short seller, like, the valuation argument is always going to be there, right? So it's, if you look at near-term financials, like, you know, the company is still on the cusp of generating material revenue. But on the other hand, if you look at And this is the game that Scotia played. It's like, pick your year, pick your out year, right? Scotia picked an out year that suited their downgrade, which was like 2028, 2027, where their free cash flow, I think it was like $3.5 billion. But then the following year they modeled $6 billion, and then the following year was $10 billion, and then it got up to like $17 billion, right? For 2032 or something. Which I think someone astutely pointed out that if they are, if AST SpaceMobile is able to get to $17.5 billion of free cash flow a year, that would put them in the top 10 companies, 10 public companies of free cash flow generation. So yeah, I think perhaps you can make a valuation argument and everybody can argue one way or the other, but What I would say though is that the short case has always been built on, I mean, the recurring theme is, are people going to adopt this solution? Are they going to pay for it? And that's just the commercial side, right? But then they haven't really, no one's really made a valuation case or argument for or against on the defense side, right? Like, so how do you quantify that? And I think that's where with this administration where Trump is Saying, you know, he wants Golden Dome to be up and running and operational before he leaves office, which doesn't leave that much time. And if you look at the needs, you know, if you talk to the company, they're the, you know, Bluebird large phased arrays, like there's nothing else out there that's comparable in terms of capability. And so I think, you know, for the US government, like, what is that worth? And I don't, I couldn't tell you, like, I think it's probably, You know, maybe a few billion in revenue a year, depending on the use cases. And it's not just like communications, but, you know, we're talking about radar sensing, electronic warfare. I mean, there's a whole slew of applications, right? So what is that worth? And in a situation where we're now in this large space race against China, who's basically trying to duplicate everything that we do, Yeah, you want this company to succeed and you want to give them the financial resources to get there. And it's not, you know, we kind of like to joke that and, you know, beat up on Starlink, but in reality, I mean, as I've said before, you know, the company is big enough, or sorry, the market is big enough for the two. And in a lot of ways, it's not, they're not really adversaries. It's really China that we're competing against. And if you look at FCC Chair Carr's recent comments, he views direct-to-cell as a key area of focus and an area that's important for US leadership, but it's beyond that, right? It's not just the commercial application, but it's also the applications on the defense side. We talk about dual use case that it enables, right? And so, yeah, it's— On the one hand, we've got this like massive white space on the commercial side, but now this defense side becomes much more visible and the street can't ignore it, right? And so research analysts, institutional investors, when they look at the company, it's not just a cell phone company, it's a defense company. It's electronic warfare, it's spoofing, it's jamming. It's backup GPS. I think we're seeing that now in Iran where Starlink is now viewed as like this light of freedom, right? Where obviously they're having some— you have Iran with Russian technology trying to jam people's access to it. But Starlink's fixed wireless business, like that is going to be, or that is a very useful tool. And so I think these companies that have dual use case, especially, you know, we talk about this theme about that space is going to be big. Yeah, more focus is going to come to the sector and for what AST is doing, people are going to have to adjust the way, you know, adjust the lens at how they analyze the company. It's not just commercial business, it's not just this this big swath of spectrum. Legato, for the sum of the parts analysis, you know, I think some people have questioned like, well, isn't $40 billion a lot for this market cap? Well, let's see if Legato's worth $12 or $15 billion. And so you've got like $30 left or $25 left, and that's how you value the commercial and military business. No, I don't think it's that. I don't think it's unreasonable. And so funny enough, like when people would value EchoStar, people wouldn't ascribe that much value to the spectrum until Charlie, of course, he had to sell it. And then all of a sudden Starlink, AT&T paid up for it and now EchoStar is trading really well, obviously partially because it's a proxy for SpaceX given the shares that they received. But yeah, I think now with this news and we expect more news, So this is the first award, you know, Shield Award for Golden Dome. As I mentioned before, I think there's going to be another one coming. You know, I'm not sure about the timing. Maybe it's, maybe it's a few days, weeks. I'm unsure, but I am certain that we are going to get additional business and yeah, the market's going to be surprised just like it was today. So it's funny enough, like while I'm speaking, Of course, someone, by the way, like Seeking Alpha is a, is kind of a trash website. Like they have all these different contributors who I don't think they really add value, just like Stone Fox Capital, our friend. But they put some pretty bad takes in this, I guess this firm or this person, Pythia Research, just put something out, AST Space Mobile Reality Check. So Oh, and let's see here. One of their things is American Tower sold 2.28 million shares pre-launch signaling valuation-driven risk management despite retaining 0.84% economic stake. Okay. Well, I've covered this before. I'll just make a quick comment on this part. Like American Tower, I don't know if you guys have seen these tower companies, but they've all been, their stock prices have been going straight down. After EchoStar pulled their buildout of their network, people have become pretty bearish on the towers because now you don't have a 4th player that's spending money on towers and stock prices have suffered as a result. And then of course, I think now, and Iridium faced this before, but I think now the market is starting to price in risk that supplemental coverage from space is going to really put a crimp on tower companies. And so as a result, you know, American Tower did sell a part of their stake, their Class A shares, but they still kept Class B shares. And so I think it was just, you know, like smart financial planning. The company's under quite a bit of pressure. Let me just take a look. They've got $1.9 billion of cash, but then they've got $45 billion of debt, right? So they raised some money from selling some stock, which I think is Was a good thing. But yeah, all these tower companies, whether it's American Tower, let's see, Crown Castle or SBA, they've all been taking a lunge in this year. We saw something similar to Iridium too, where I think investors for the most part kind of dismissed, and Iridium dismissed supplemental coverage from space. And then one day people all of a sudden became smart to it. And then Iridium went from like $40 to, I think like $19 now. Yeah, $19. So yeah, life comes at you pretty fast. And so I think for American Tower, who's a great strategic partner, early investor, for them to sell part of their stake, they made a pretty hefty return. I think, yeah, you can't really fault them for that. But let's see. So I'm going to see if there's any questions or comments. I've been speaking now for 45 minutes. Just look here. Tut Capital. I read a Substack that Golden Dome was hopium. Care to comment, pumper? Yeah, it's not hopium. I guess, yeah, I guess I'm a pumper. He's making a joke about valuations. Which is funny. You know, it's like, I guess I'll just comment on this. This is something that we should all expect as the company executes and moves up in terms of valuation. There's going to be people that come in and think that they can, you know, they come in with like some new angle or view to be short. And this is something that, for example, Tesla experience for many years, right? Where I think people were, the short sellers looked at near-term fundamentals like valuation and hey, you can't justify the company's valuation based off of this coming year or the year-over-year growth or any of that stuff or margins. But then, and they would short and they would get run over, right? Because they couldn't see the bigger picture or they couldn't think beyond that, which I always talk about this, how Hedge funds tend to, well, they have to manage their book on a day-to-day, week-to-week, month-to-month basis, right? And so they can't really think in terms of even quarters now or years or multiple years. They're just focused on the here and now. And so when you're kind of geared to do that, then you tend to miss the forest from the trees, which is, you know, I posted a video today that someone else had shared where obviously, you know, there was this like news reporter who was skeptical about Amazon and, you know, some of the criticisms back when Amazon was losing money back in the '90s was that they would have to sell every single book on earth in order to turn a profit. Well, lo and behold, like that was the common view. Whereas of course Amazon moved beyond books, they started selling everything. And then they moved into outsourced infrastructure, which is AWS and all these other areas because of basically like pieces of business that branched out from what originally they were doing, which is kind of like what AST is doing. Or you can make the analogy of NVIDIA too, which is moving from graphic processors, those processors being applicable to other applications. And so our satellites, Providing broadband connectivity to mobile phones, but then, you know, using the satellites to do detection and radar, right? And so, so I think like as we kind of move along this journey, you're going to see more skeptics come out, high-profile shorts. And I'm hoping that that's the case because that's always fun. But yeah, these people will come out. They often like don't, they kind of see this retail community from the outside and assume that it's just a bunch of crazy people that don't know what they're doing and that it's just a meme. And they come up with like the same tired, you know, short thesis points of companies are overvalued, there's no adoption, there won't be adoption, or a big TAM. And, you know, they won't even They won't even address like the military side because they probably don't understand that. And then they'll come up with the same stuff and then they'll get beaten up and then, you know, they'll lose some money, they'll cover, and then we'll move on, right? They'll be onto the next cohort of short sellers who think they've got, you know, some new angle and that they're smarter than retail. So yeah, this is just going to be part of the normal lifecycle of this or this journey of this investment where going to be new short sellers. They're going to— some might actually come with like some new ideas. I mean, like this guy Valuations, um, he kind of cooked up the same old arguments but then really came at it from the meme perspective, like, oh, this company is, uh, these, these investors are, are a cult, and so, um, I'm going to take them down, right? I'm going to scare the shit out of them and make them, you know, sell the stock down, and then I can cover. Um, which I would say like the old days of smash-and-grab short sellers, like, those are long gone, right? Like, people are much smarter now. Like, the times when you would have activist short sellers like Carisdale or, you know, some of these others who would put out sensational stuff, hope that the stock goes down 20, 30%, and then cover their position, probably cover like half to two-thirds of the position on that first day of trading and make most of their money. And then, you know, they might publish one thing here or there, But there was always this like specter that they're still out there and they could come out with more stuff, right? But the great thing is like if you've been following this company for 5 years and you've been through every single up and down and you understand the thesis, you know what you own, you know the other side's arguments to a tee, then you can't be shaken from the investment. And if anything, I mean, it's always good to hear the other side, but yeah, you just build your conviction. And so anyway, I think like, yeah, it's just part of the normal journey and we'll see what happens tomorrow and in the coming weeks, months, and years. But I do wholeheartedly believe like this year is the year for space investing. Like we're in the right place at the right time. It's a clear area of focus for this administration and Golden Dome, $151 billion to deploy this protective network that's going to require a bunch of satellites. It's going to require a bunch of people working together. It's going to be good, right? And there's only a few public companies, a few different ways to play this. And there's going to be, you know, I tweeted earlier today, I think there's like 4 or 5 space-focused ETFs that are about to come out. And so yeah, it's almost like I hate to say it, but it's like the early days of crypto, right? When there wasn't much focus. I mean, you couldn't, if you were to tell people you're invested in space companies in 2024, people would laugh at you. But now it's like the companies that we're invested in are the top performers for 2025 and they've already started for 2026. So anyway, I'm rambling now. I'm going to end the space here. It's been 50 minutes. But yeah, I'm looking forward to— I just got back from a restaurant for a closing dinner. I had like a few glasses of wine. I was quite happy, but I haven't even had much time to digest this stuff. So I'm going to do some reading this evening and we'll see what happens tomorrow. Maybe some news will come out overnight and maybe I'll do like a quick morning space before trading opens. So anyway, thanks everyone for joining. Yeah, uh, today is a great day and, um, looking forward to seeing hopefully PR from the company or not. If not, that's okay. Um, and yeah, we'll go from there. All right, thanks everyone. [00:49:04] Speaker A: Thanks for listening to the AST SpaceMobile Podcast. If you enjoyed this episode and you'd like to help support the podcast, please share it with others, post about it on social media, or leave a rating and To catch all the latest news about AST SpaceMobile, make sure to subscribe. Thanks again, and I'll see you next time. [00:49:24] Speaker B: We're doing something very, very big, and I think with this technology we can really affect a billion lives. AST SpaceMobile is the only company that has proven technology to deliver cellular broadband connectivity directly from space. It'll be everyday smartphone. People will just basically turn on their phone and be seamless. Regardless of where you are, we don't want the user even to know that it's connected by satellite. Our role is to bring this into reality, always in partnership with the MNOs. [00:50:08] Speaker A: Mmm, waffles. [00:50:09] Speaker B: Mmm, waffles.
GUID: 24f66c5a-67f5-49ad-a52c-154012a8eeed
· Audio source
· Model: claude-cli/claude-sonnet-5
· Processed: 2026-07-24T05:03:23+00:00