Episode
Anpanman - SpaceX Secondary Sale Value at $800B + 2H 2026 IPO? Implications for the sector
In this solo episode, Anpanman reacts to breaking news that SpaceX's insider secondary share tender is being valued at $800 billion per the Wall Street Journal. That compares with Bloomberg's disputed $560 billion figure and the prior $400 billion October tender.
He also reacts to a separate report that SpaceX may pursue an IPO in the second half of 2026.
He argues this is unambiguously bullish for the whole space sector, including AST SpaceMobile and Rocket Lab. In his view it will draw new investor attention, create valuation comparables, and eventually bring full financial transparency to SpaceX's launch and Starlink direct-to-cell businesses.
His headline conclusion: he personally bought more ASTS on the news and says he's 'about as bullish as can be' on AST heading into 2026 given this catalyst plus Golden Dome awards expected soon.
Key Takeaways
- The Wall Street Journal reported that SpaceX's insider secondary share sale (tender) is being valued at $800 billion, citing SpaceX CFO Brett Johnson telling investors in recent days, per multiple sources — roughly double SpaceX's prior $400 billion valuation from an October 2025 tender.
- Bloomberg disputed the $800 billion figure, initially unable to confirm it and sticking with an older ~$500 billion valuation, then publishing its own estimate that the tender could value SpaceX at $560 billion instead.
- A secondary share sale/tender is different from a primary raise: SpaceX itself isn't raising capital or selling equity — existing employees and investors are selling their own shares for liquidity, which is common for long-private tech companies.
- The Information separately reported SpaceX has told investors it may go public in the second half of 2026, though Anpanman notes The Information's reporting record has been inconsistent.
- Anpanman argues a SpaceX IPO would be a net positive for AST SpaceMobile and Rocket Lab rather than a capital drain, because it would draw more generalist, growth, and specialist investors into the space sector as a whole, and could make AST/Rocket Lab look 'cheap' by comparison if SpaceX trades at a rich valuation multiple.
- Anpanman estimates that if SpaceX's revenue/operating income mix is roughly 65-70% Starlink and 65% of an $800 billion valuation is applied, that implies about a $520 billion valuation for Starlink alone, with the remainder attributable to the launch business — his own back-of-envelope math, not a company disclosure.
- Starlink Direct-to-Cell has added SoftBank and KDDI in Japan alongside NTT Docomo, giving SpaceX effective coverage of Japan's major carriers, but AST SpaceMobile cannot pursue those same carriers because of Rakuten's exclusivity agreement with AST in Japan.
- Anpanman cited current space-sector market caps: Rocket Lab about $28 billion, AST SpaceMobile about $27 billion, Voyager about $1.4 billion, Redwire about $1 billion, BlackSky about $660 million, and EchoStar about $23.6 billion equity value (roughly $51 billion enterprise value including ~$31 billion of debt, with a large chunk of its valuation tied to its private SpaceX stake).
- Anpanman says he personally bought a small amount of additional AST SpaceMobile stock upon seeing the SpaceX valuation news and noted the stock ticked up, while EchoStar shares also rose given its SpaceX ownership stake.
- Anpanman flags Golden Dome contract awards as a near-term catalyst he expects in the next few weeks, up to around the end of January 2026.
Detailed Discussion4 topics
SpaceX Secondary Share Tender Valuation Reports
7
-
The Wall Street Journal updated its story to report that SpaceX's secondary share sale (tender) is being valued at $800 billion, based on SpaceX CFO Brett Johnson telling investors in recent days, according to multiple sources.
-
Bloomberg has not been able to confirm the $800 billion number and was still citing an older ~$500 billion valuation; Bloomberg then put out its own piece estimating the tender could value SpaceX at $560 billion, disagreeing with WSJ's $800 billion figure.
-
A secondary share sale is not the company raising money — SpaceX itself isn't issuing new equity; it's a tender giving existing employees and investors (insiders) an opportunity to sell some of their shares for liquidity, which is common for companies that have stayed private a long time.
-
SpaceX's prior tender in October 2025 was valued at $400 billion; the newly reported $560 billion (Bloomberg) to $800 billion (WSJ) figures would represent a large step-up — up to roughly double — in about a month and a half.
-
Per the WSJ article, Starlink now has more than 8 million active customers and is driving the valuation increase, while the rocket and satellite business remains dominant in launch even as other parts of the broader Musk business empire face growth challenges.
-
Separately, The Information reported that SpaceX has told investors it is looking to go public in the second half of 2026; Anpanman flags The Information's reporting record on this topic as 'somewhat spotty' historically.
-
Anpanman speculates SpaceX is deliberately staging a steady cadence of ever-increasing tender valuations (from $400B to $560-800B) to build momentum toward an IPO, guessing SpaceX could eventually target an IPO valuation north of a trillion dollars, likely priced at a discount (he guesses around 10%) to produce a first-day pop before an eventual lock-up-expiry wave of insider selling.
Starlink Direct-to-Cell Competitive Update
5
-
Starlink Direct-to-Cell has picked up SoftBank and KDDI as additional MNO partners in Japan, on top of NTT Docomo, giving SpaceX effective coverage of Japan's major carriers.
-
AST SpaceMobile cannot pursue SoftBank, NTT Docomo, or KDDI in Japan even if they wanted to work with AST, because Rakuten holds an exclusivity agreement with AST SpaceMobile in Japan.
-
Rakuten was one of the earliest investors in AST SpaceMobile (arriving shortly after the earliest investors) and, in Anpanman's words, 'without them, we wouldn't be here today'; Rakuten's Mikitani sits on AST's board, and AST uses some of Rakuten's O-RAN software.
-
Citing research analyst breakdowns he recalls (flagged as from memory, not exact), he believes a large majority of Starlink's future growth will come from direct-to-cell rather than fixed wireless, guessing direct-to-cell could account for roughly two-thirds of Starlink's subscriber growth and, potentially, profitability contribution 'in the out years.'
-
SpaceX's exclusivity agreement with T-Mobile for Direct-to-Cell is set to end in 2026, after which T-Mobile could pursue other options or SpaceX could try to pursue AT&T or Verizon, though Anpanman notes 'we know how that story ends' given AT&T/Verizon's existing AST agreements.
Implications of a SpaceX IPO for the Space Sector
12
-
Responding to a listener question about whether SpaceX going public could pull capital away from names like Rocket Lab or AST SpaceMobile, Anpanman argues the opposite is more likely: increased sector attention should bring more total investment dollars into the space sector rather than just reallocating existing dollars.
-
He contrasts today's space sector, which lacked dedicated hedge-fund industry specialists as recently as 2023-2024 due to insufficient market cap, with today's larger, more liquid 'chunky' companies — citing Rocket Lab at about $28 billion and AST SpaceMobile at about $27 billion (noting AST's figure includes Abel Avellan's Class C shares, which aren't fully tradable).
-
AST SpaceMobile's trading liquidity has grown substantially — from roughly 100,000 shares traded on some days when it was a $600-700 million small cap, to around 10 million shares traded per day now.
-
Other space-sector companies cited by market cap: Voyager at about $1.4 billion, Redwire (after closing its Edge Autonomy acquisition) at about $1 billion, BlackSky at about $660 million, and EchoStar trading at about $23.6 billion equity value with about $31 billion of debt (roughly $51 billion enterprise value) — a large portion of EchoStar's valuation reflecting its private SpaceX share stake.
-
He predicts a SpaceX IPO will trigger a 'mad scramble' among growth investors, generalists, tech investors, and aerospace/defense analysts to get up to speed on the sector, eventually leading to dedicated space-sector specialist investing groups, ETFs, and sector-focused mutual funds.
-
Going public would give the market full financial transparency into SpaceX's launch and Starlink businesses — a contrast to today's opaque access via special purpose vehicles (SPVs), which typically charge 1-2% management fees plus 15-20% carried interest and provide only high-level information, not full financials; Anpanman recalls reviewing a Goldman Sachs SpaceX share offering document that contained essentially no financial disclosures.
-
As a public company, SpaceX would face new scrutiny and stock-price volatility it hasn't experienced as a private company — for example, public investors would likely react visibly to events like the recent Starship static-fire explosion on the pad, unlike private valuations that only move at infrequent transaction points.
-
Post-IPO, sell-side analysts covering SpaceX will likely ask about its win rate against AST SpaceMobile for MNO partnerships and why SpaceX hasn't secured more MNOs, with dozens of research analysts across Wall Street expected to initiate coverage and discuss the competitive landscape, making AST and other names 'household names' by extension.
-
If SpaceX trades at a rich valuation multiple relative to its growth once public, investors may extrapolate that AST SpaceMobile and Rocket Lab look comparatively cheap and buy those names alongside SpaceX; conversely, some market-neutral funds may go long SpaceX privately and short AST/Rocket Lab and other space names as a hedge, a dynamic Anpanman believes may already be contributing to current short interest in these stocks.
-
Attention will likely next turn to whether Blue Origin might go public, but Anpanman notes there's no real valuation benchmark for it since it's essentially fully funded by Jeff Bezos, and he's unsure whether Blue Origin has taken any outside investment or sold any shares beyond employee stock grants.
-
Using a rough valuation split, Anpanman estimates that if SpaceX's current financial contribution (revenue/operating income) is about 65-70% Starlink, then 65% of an $800 billion valuation would imply roughly a $520 billion valuation for Starlink alone, with the remainder attributable to the launch business.
-
He argues SpaceX should arguably trade at a premium valuation multiple as the dominant, at-scale industry leader, but that smaller companies like AST SpaceMobile and Rocket Lab may have more room for rapid multiple-driven growth (potentially '10x') than an already-$800 billion SpaceX.
Personal Positioning and Near-Term Catalysts
3
-
Anpanman says he personally bought a small amount of additional AST SpaceMobile stock immediately upon seeing the SpaceX valuation news, and the stock ticked up slightly afterward; he also notes EchoStar shares rose on the news given its ownership stake in SpaceX.
-
Anpanman says he expects Golden Dome contract awards as a near-term catalyst, guessing the major awards will likely come in the next few weeks, up to around the end of January 2026.
-
Anpanman describes himself as 'about as bullish as can be' on AST SpaceMobile given the stack of catalysts heading into 2026, and notes he needs to update his personal catalyst tracker because a number of catalysts have already occurred.
Watch Items4
-
Whether SpaceX's insider secondary tender actually closes and at what final valuation (WSJ's reported $800B vs. Bloomberg's disputed $560B)
-
Potential SpaceX IPO, per a report from The Information that SpaceX has told investors it may go public
-
Golden Dome contract awards expected as a near-term catalyst for AST SpaceMobile
-
Expiration of SpaceX/T-Mobile Direct-to-Cell exclusivity, after which T-Mobile or SpaceX could pursue other partners
Open Questions4
-
Will SpaceX's move toward going public divert investor capital away from other space names like AST SpaceMobile and Rocket Lab, or will it expand the total pool of capital invested in the sector?
-
Which reported valuation for SpaceX's secondary tender is accurate — WSJ's $800 billion or Bloomberg's $560 billion?
-
Will Blue Origin ever go public, and if so, what would its valuation benchmark be given the lack of outside investment or secondary sale data points?
-
How much detail will SpaceX be required or willing to disclose post-IPO about its direct-to-cell business, MNO contracts, and competitive win rates against AST SpaceMobile?
Raw Transcript
Show full transcript
[00:00:06] Speaker A: This is the AST SpaceMobile Podcast. [00:00:09] Speaker B: It will just basically come to your phone and be seamless regardless of where you are. We don't want the user even to know that it's connected by satellite. Listen, the opportunity that we have is very, very, very large. [00:00:25] Speaker A: Hey everyone. [00:00:29] Speaker C: I guess I'm going to be doing multiple, multiple Spaces a day because there's just all kinds of news coming out. It seems like there's never a dull day in space. Um, yeah, so, so actually there's an update here from Wall Street Journal. Let me look here. Let's see if there's any new news here. Actually, I'm gonna just read this Wall Street Journal update. It looks like, so it's weird. Bloomberg has, they haven't been able to confirm the $800 billion number. I think Bloomberg's still on the old valuation of $500 billion, but then Wall Street Journal, they just updated their story saying that The secondary share sale is at $800 billion, and this is the SpaceX CFO Brett Johnson has told investors about in recent days, the people said. So it's multiple sources. Let's see here. So that's basically double the value that they had back in October for a secondary share sale. So I guess for any insiders that sold shares back in October, they're probably gnashing their teeth, upset that they didn't get Double the price. Let me just see here, screening through this. It also talks about like how his business empire is facing growth challenges, but the rocket and satellite company remains stronger than ever with its dominant position in launch. And then Starlink is doing well, has like more than 8 million active customers, which is driving up the valuation. So just a reminder for people, this is a secondary share sale. So it's not, the company's not raising what we call a primary sale. They're not raising, the company's not raising money on its behalf. It's not selling a piece of the company. It's actually insiders selling out. So imagine that it says it's a tender. So it's an opportunity for employees and investors to monetize Their shares. And this is pretty common for tech companies that have gone, that haven't gone public for a really long time. And you have insiders that want some level of liquidity and to keep people happy, you present them with opportunities to sell stock periodically. And so that's what this tender is. Let's see here. One of the things it says here, I'm just going through this Wall Street Journal update and I'll tweet this out. Okay, I'm going to tweet this out. But yeah, I wanted to talk about what this means for AST, but also Rocket Lab and the rest of the sector. I'm going to just post this so people can see what they wrote. The weird thing is like when you copy stuff from Bloomberg, it doesn't format it properly for you when you put it into a tweet. So you got to format, which is a pain in the ass. Let's see. So I think that's the entire article. So I'm going to tweet this out. You know, it's kind of funny when you, um, this is kind of minutia, but whenever you tweet things, you, you tend to get better engagement if you put a picture, a picture along with it. Uh, so I'm going to find a picture. But yeah, this, this is pretty big news. I mean, of course, the other big news, you know, the information not to be one-upped, um, disclosed, and, you know, the, the information depending on who the journalist is. They've been somewhat spotty in terms of their record, but they're claiming that SpaceX is looking or has told investors that it's looking to go public in the second half of 2026, which is a big deal for the sector. And I'll talk about why that is, but let me just put this out there. So yeah, Wall Street Journal, they updated the article as I mentioned before, Bloomberg, they put out a basically a refutation piece. They're refuting it. They're saying, yeah, they're going to do a tender, but we have no indication that it's going to be at double the price that what they were talking about before. Just so people know, Bloomberg put out an article and said that the share sale could be could value it at $560 billion, which in of itself is still pretty crazy, right? Because the company. Did a tender in October that was valued at $400 billion. And now, depending on who you believe, either it's going to be at $560 billion from Bloomberg or $800 billion with the Wall Street Journal, $800 billion being basically double the valuation in, I guess, a month and a half's time. So anyway, that's pretty big. I mean, that just shows you the level of interest in the space sector and I think to see, you know, SpaceX's progress around launch, obviously they're still pushing forward with Starship and they, they, they were, you know, they, they still have a lot of milestones to hit before that thing can be fully commercial. But Starlink, for all intents and purposes, have been quite successful on the fixed wireless side. And then the direct-to-cell efforts, you know, they picked up some additional MNOs. I actually need to update my my sheet, like they picked up KDDI and SoftBank in Japan on top of NTT Docomo. So they pretty much have a lock on Japan, which makes sense because we have a mutually exclusive agreement with Rakuten or Rakuten has exclusivity in Japan. So even if SoftBank or NTT Docomo or KDDI wanted to work with us, we just can't. Rakuten, by the way, was an early seed investor and they were not seed investor, but they were right after some of the earliest investors in AST SpaceMobile. And without them, we wouldn't be here today. So they're an important customer and Miki Mikitani sits on the board of the company and we utilize some of their O-RAN software. But anyway, But yeah, this is big news. I mean, Starlink has been making good progress and so has SpaceX. A big part of Starlink's growth story, if you look at, there's a few research analysts that do cover SpaceX and when they break out some of the numbers between Starlink fixed wireless and Starlink direct-to-cell, a vast majority of growth for Starlink is going to come from direct-to-cell. I mean, in particular, number of subscribers, which is obvious because there's a lot of devices, but then in terms of ARPU, there's going to be a pretty big level of contribution. I think I forgot, like, when I looked at it last, I think direct-to-cell is going to account for like 2/3 of Starlink's growth and maybe profitability, you know, in the out years. But anyway, with the company potentially going public, that's going to draw a lot more interest to the space sector. And so Someone had a question when I was kind of going through this information. They were questioning whether or not perhaps SpaceX going public might suck capital out and cause other names in the sector to go down. I guess it's possible, like some people who are invested in Rocket Lab or AST SpaceMobile might sell part of their position and buy SpaceX. But I think the opposite's actually going to happen because I think You know, we're at this point where space is kind of like this backwater, this like cottage industry. I mean, it was like this, certainly like this, like a few years ago, like 2023, 2024. If you went to a hedge fund and asked them like, hey, do you have any specialists that cover the sector? There wouldn't be anyone because there's not enough market cap and not enough companies to have industry specialists covering space. But now you've got pretty big sizable companies, chunky companies to invest in. Rocket Lab is, let's see, Rocket Lab is $28 billion in size. AST SpaceMobile is $27 billion. Obviously not all of that is tradable because Abel owns a bunch of Class C shares, which are included in that calculation. But It's a big company and we've raised dSpace Mobile, what used to be basically a small cap company when it was like $600 or $700 million, would trade like some days it would trade 100,000 shares. Now it trades 10 million shares. And so that's a very liquid company that you can invest in. And so the sector has matured quite a bit. I mean, not only do you have these companies that grew up from being a SPAC, but you have these other players, whether it's Voyager, which is like $1.4 billion in market cap. Let's see, I guess Redwire after they closed Edge Autonomy is about a billion. And then you've got, let me see here, BlackSky. BlackSky is like $670, no, $660. And then of course you've got like some of the legacy guys. I mean, of course EchoStar is now trading at a pretty Nice valuation of $23.6 billion. Obviously a big chunk of that is the private SpaceX shares that it owns, but it also has $31 billion of debt. So EchoStar is like $51 billion enterprise value, which is pretty nuts. But what this does though is when SpaceX comes public going into the second half of next year, there's going to be this mad scramble. I mean, actually this news in and of itself is going to get people interested in the sector. And so you're going to have growth investors, generalists, tech investors, aerospace defense guys, they're all going to get a bit smarter about the public companies that are out there. And so you're just going to draw more interest. And then eventually there's going to be formation of groups that are specifically focused on the space sector. Because I think if you're doing long-short fundamental investing, You want to have specialists who really understand the underlying dynamics of the industry and all the different companies and how they're all intertwined, which in space, that's the case. Like there's companies that are in competition with each other. They also service each other. I mean, SpaceX is a prime example of that where they provide launch and they compete with other launch providers, but they also send up other people's satellites, right? And so understanding, having a deep understanding of all that, which quite frankly, if you've been following the sector and have been an investor in AST or Rocket Lab, you actually know these dynamics quite well. And so I don't know, maybe some of you guys will get a job at a hedge fund being their expert. But anyway, but yeah, as you approach the IPO, there's going to be people doing work and they're going to learn about some some of these other companies. And the thing that happens is like you're going to get more dollars into the sector and it's going to become a standalone investable area. And then, you know, there's going to be, whether it's ETFs, you know, sector mutual funds, there's going to be people focusing dollars in this area and it's just going to help the entire ecosystem. And the good thing about SpaceX going public is that Then you're going to have this transparency into what SpaceX is doing. Like at this point, everybody kind of speculates and just depends, I mean, on what, you know, what the company's comments are from time to time to the public or Elon Musk. And it's funny, even if, you know, I've had 3 or 4 chances, I mean, pretty much probably most investors of some size have had some chance to take a look at SpaceX and invest. But taking a look, that's like a very loose term. Um, 'cause oftentimes when you invest, it has to be through a special purpose vehicle, um, which then pools money, then invests in SpaceX shares. And that, you know, SPV will take some fee upfront and, or, you know, some management fee on an ongoing basis of maybe 1 to 2%, and then it'll take 15 to 20% of the ups. And so that's not really a great way to invest, but if you want access, you know, there's, there's a whole cottage industry around firms that are, that are big enough and have relationships where they get access to private shares and then they create these SPVs and then they basically, you know, sell off pieces of that SPV. But when they do that, oftentimes the only information you get is like very high level. This is what SpaceX does and this is what they're planning to do, but there's really no, I mean, depending on your level of access, but even private investors, like they don't get access to full financials, which is pretty crazy. And this isn't just for SpaceX, it's for other hot private companies that are doing these types of private play, I mean, secondary sales or sales through SPVs. And so even over my years, and maybe I'll post this actually, because I, there was a Goldman Sachs offering document that I had to look at for SpaceX shares and There was basically like no financial information. And that's just kind of how private investing is when you're not an institutional VC, right? But even some of those guys don't get full access to financials. But the great thing about SpaceX going public is like, we're going to get full transparency on how the rocket business is doing, you know, launch, how Starlink is doing, I mean, depending on how much the SEC pushes them, and then of course what they want to disclose as KPIs, then we might see, get some level of granularity of like, you know, how much of the businesses is being driven by fixed wireless versus direct-to-cell. Maybe they will disclose some level of detail, probably not, but some level of detail of how their contracts are structured, like with T-Mobile, for example. I mean, we know that the exclusivity with T-Mobile is going to end in 2026. And then, you know, at that point, T-Mobile is free to go do something else or add somebody else, or, you know, SpaceX could also try to, you know, try to pursue AT&T or Verizon. Um, but we know how that story ends. But, um, what's, what's good though, is that people are going to get a better sense for, you know, what is the, the proxy for space, um, SpaceX. They're going to have a better sense of how the company's performing. And for competitors, it's going to be very eye-opening and helpful, right? Because then competitors are going to, and this is why some companies stay private for as long as they can, because they don't want this stuff out in the public. But SpaceX is at that point when they go public, they're going to be also exposed to public scrutiny. And so for a company that had talked about Starship landing on the moon when it was first announced, that they were planning to land on the moon by 2022, this whole level of scrutiny, they're going to basically come under the same pressure that the rest of these public companies in space face, right? And so what I mean by that is obviously space is really hard. We harp about this over and over again and delays are inevitable. And so that's going to be a pretty big reminder as a public company. And it's also I think public investors in SpaceX are going to have to get used to, you know, when you're a private investor, you don't, there's no volatility. Whatever the shares, some small portion of shares that were transacted in a given month, like that sets the valuation for the company for until the next time. [00:16:34] Speaker A: Right. [00:16:35] Speaker C: And so if you blow up a few rockets, like no one really cares because they don't feel the visceral movement of the stock price reacting to that versus You know, when you have, when you're public and let's say Starship goes up and maybe there's, you know, like this last Starship test, like on the launch pad, you know, they had a static fire and then the thing blew up. Public investors will probably react to that. Right. And so that's going to be something to get used to. And so I think, you know, for the sector, as I was saying before, it'll be good For folks to see what the economics are for SpaceX on the launch side and on the communication side, because these are 2 businesses that are relatively scaled. And so if you're a Rocket Lab holder, you might try to do some comparisons and see if gross margins are similar, operating margins, maybe once Rocket Lab gets to medium launch and it's on a regular cadence, then Maybe SpaceX, if those margins are pretty attractive, that's kind of the target that you want to go achieve, or at least that's best in class. And on the flip side for Starlink, you know, obviously fixed wireless is a pretty profitable business, but then the direct-to-cell, you know, that will be something that AST SpaceMobile investors can cop against. You know, hey, we're outperforming them or we're underperforming them. And then as a public company, they'll disclose or need to disclose you know, which MNOs they're working with. And, you know, investor or sell-side analysts are going to ask them on calls like, you know, what's your win rate against AST SpaceMobile for MNOs? And why haven't you guys gotten more MNOs? Or who, you know, how are you different from AST? And there's going to be like this whole deluge of research coverage that comes in that are going to have to, I mean, and you know, there's going to be like every firm on the street, you know, 20, 30 research analysts are going to cover SpaceX. And all those are going to have initiations of coverage. And as part of those initiations of coverage, they'll talk about the space industry and the competitive landscape and who the players are. And so it's going to be a big coming out party for the sector. And so for names like, you know, AST SpaceMobile or, you know, some of these others, Rocket Lab, Firefly, you name it, like people are going to become they're going to become more household names, right? Because then for these like crazy space companies that people ignored, like they're going to have to focus, not by choice necessarily, but they're going to focus. And so yeah, it's going to be a big positive for the sector. It's going to bring more awareness. You're going to have a juggernaut that's trading, that's going to bring a tremendous amount of investing dollars and it's going to cause different dynamics. Like people are going to look at SpaceX and if it trades at a big premium evaluation relative to its growth, then people are going to extrapolate that into some of these other companies and say, oh, you know, AST SpaceMobile is actually like, from a valuation multiple perspective, it's really cheap. So I'm going to own some SpaceX, but I'm also going to buy some AST as well. And, you know, the same for Rocket Lab maybe. And then the other thing that's going to happen, of course, is you're going to get some people that are going to short space companies because they're going to say, I own SpaceX and I need to hedge it. Like if you run, if you, if you're at like a fund that requires, you know, it's market neutral, then they might go long SpaceX and they short some AST and Rocket Lab and a basket of others, depending on how they want to manage their exposures. Although I would argue that that probably is already happening and that, that probably accounts for some of the short interest in all these names, like people who are long SpaceX on the private side, and then they actually hedge some of these space names that are public. So that probably is happening to a degree, but yeah, there'll be all these interesting dynamics, right? And I think by having SpaceX public, you know, it's overall, it's just going to be a huge net positive. And then of course, like people are going to turn their eyes toward Blue Origin and say, okay, well, when's Blue Origin going to go public or is it going to go public? And of course there's no valuation metrics around that company because pretty much it's fully funded by Jeff Bezos. And so they haven't, I actually, I'm not sure if they've taken any outside money or if they've sold any or if he sold any of that company aside from just giving stock to employees who, just given how long Blue Origin has been private, there's probably some employees itching to monetize some of their shares. So But yeah, I think heading into the first half of 2026, I mean, this is, you couldn't ask for more bullish news for the sector because you've got Golden Dome, which, you know, it's the big awards are probably coming in the next few weeks to probably, you know, the end of January. And so that's a huge catalyst. Then you've got SpaceX, if they actually get this secondary share sale off and some employees are able to tender their shares at an $800 billion valuation, which, you know, I'd remind people that, and this is why I tweeted before, but SpaceX, you know, if you look at current financial contribution in terms of revenue and operating income, you know, it's probably around 65, 70%. And so if you just did just a simple math of, let's say it's 65% of 800, that implies $520 billion valuation for Starlink. And then of course, the remainder of that is launch. And so if you're a SpaceX, or sorry, if you're an AST SpaceMobile shareholder or Rocket Lab shareholder, that's very relevant to you because that, you know, companies to a degree will trade at Within ranges of, you know, we call comparable valuations. And so if it turns out when research analysts initiate coverage and when we look at the proxy, when they file the IPO prospectus, I mean, when they file it and you get to see some of the historical financials, people are immediately going to start looking, doing comparisons of valuations of existing companies to SpaceX. And, you know, SpaceX arguably should trade at a decent premium, right? Because it's a one-of-a-kind company. It's at scale. It's the juggernaut industry leader. And so it should trade at some premium valuation relative to the others. But then the balance to that, of course, is that these smaller companies probably have much more rapid growth prospects because for a company as big as SpaceX, if it's at an $800 billion valuation, how much upside is there, right? And versus for some of these smaller companies that where they could 10x Over the same period or who knows, right? So yeah, that's a big positive. And I think the other thing is the valuation uplift. They're probably— what SpaceX is trying to do in doing these tenders at ever-increasing values is, as a private company, you want to see a step up in valuation and in a steady cadence of that until you go public. 'Cause then it supports, or it's supposed to support a high valuation when you go public. So if they're targeting $800 billion now, the second half of 2026, they're probably going to go public at a trillion, right? And they're hoping that through the progression of these subsequent valuation data points that people will be comfortable with the company trading at north of a trillion, right? Because the company, They'll probably, you know, value coming into Troyan, they'll price it at a discount, you know, maybe 10% discount to entice IPO investors. And then, you know, you'll get that pop on the first day and then hopefully it trades there until the lockup expiry comes and then you start having some insider selling. But yeah, this is big news. And I think as we set up for 2026, just having this backdrop, you know, you've got a very accommodative rate environment and hopefully, knock on wood, inflation continues to be held in check and it's moderate. And then you've got this huge event of SpaceX going public. It's just going to bring more excitement. And then of course, you know, as I mentioned before, Golden Dome and any number of other catalysts. So this is good news. I think, you know, when I saw the news, uh, it, I immediately bought a little bit of AST and then of course it popped a little. And then of course, you know, for the people who are playing some of the parts story for EchoStar, you know, there's that, that stock is up because obviously they own some SpaceX shares. But, um, yeah, I think, I think, um, let's see here. Just reading this. Um, yeah, it's, this is I'm sure we're going to see more stories and then there'll be this catalyst around whether or not those shares do get sold. And yeah, it's, I'm about as bullish as can be on AST just given all the catalysts that are coming up. I actually need to update my catalyst tracker or whatever catalyst season post that I normally do because there's quite a bit that's already happened. But Anyway, I just wanted to hop on and just talk about this and again, you know, test this microphone, which I think is working now. But yeah, this is good. This is good for the sector. It's going to draw more eyeballs and the valuation, my guess is SpaceX is trading at a really hefty valuation relative to its growth prospects. And so that's going to be really good when you translate into What is T-Space Mobile, Rocket Lab? You know, some of these other companies, what they're doing. But anyway, let me see. I'm just looking to see some questions here. Oh, there are no questions. All right. Well, that's my space. It's short and sweet. Just wanted to comment on this and we'll talk again at some point in the future. I'm sure maybe this evening if some more news comes out. Anyway, take care everyone. [00:26:59] Speaker A: Listening to the AST Space Mobile podcast. If you enjoyed this episode and you'd like to help support the podcast, please share it with others, post about it on social media, or leave a rating and review. To catch all the latest news about AST Space Mobile, make sure to subscribe. Thanks again, and I'll see you next time. [00:27:22] Speaker B: We're doing something very, very big. Our team needs to know that we. AST SpaceMobile is the only company that has proven technology to deliver cellular broadband connectivity directly from space to the everyday smartphone. People will just basically turn on their phone and be seamless regardless of where you are. We don't want the user even to know that it's connected by satellite. Our role is to bring this into reality. barbecue with the animals. [00:27:55] Speaker A: Listen. [00:28:03] Speaker B: Mmm, waffles.
GUID: 48cec899-d13f-4235-8cf2-d217b24f42c8
· Audio source
· Model: claude-cli/claude-sonnet-5
· Processed: 2026-07-24T05:23:21+00:00